Bakgrunnur


Heimasíðan ] Kynning á verkefninu ] [ Bakgrunnur ] Þátttakendur ] Námskeiðið ]

Heimasíðan

 


Að opna leiðir að samskiptum, menntun og starfi fyrir konur með notkun upplýsingatækni

CEE-WIT (Communications, Education & Employment for Women through Information Tecnology)

Ríkisstjórn Íslands mælir fyrir um að Íslendingar verði í fararbroddi þjóða heims við nýtingu upplýsingatækni til að bæta menntun og samkeppnishæfi þjóðarinnar á sem flestum sviðum [1]. Og mikið átak er nú í gangi í menntakerfinu til að stuðla að betri menntun ungs fólks á þessu sviði. Ljóst er hins vegar að ýmsir hópar í þjóðfélaginu eiga það á hættu að verða langt á eftir öðrum hvað varðar tölvu- og upplýsingalæsi og draga þar með mjög úr möguleikum sínum hvað varðar störf og betri menntun.  Einnig geta landshlutar komið illa út í samanburði við önnur svæði.  Nýleg Gallup könnun (1998) sýnir að konur hafa mun minni reynslu af notkun tölva og upplýsingatækni  en karlar og landsbyggðin kemur mjög illa út í samanburði við Reykjavík og nágrenni hvað varðar aðgang og notkun [2].  

Slíkt ójafnræði er alls ekki bundið við Ísland eingöngu.  Þegar fulltrúar Fræðslusambandsins Símennt og Iðntæknistofnunar fóru í fyrra af stað með hugmynd að þessu verkefni fengust mjög skjótt og auðveldlega samstarfsaðilar frá Írlandi, Noregi og Slóvakíu.  En í þeim löndum standa menn einnig frammi fyrir því að efla þurfi atvinnu og menntamöguleika í dreifbýli með tilkomu nýrrar tækni en ýmsir hópar, ekki síst  konur með takmarkaða menntun geti ekki nýtt sér sem skyldi starfs- og menntunar- og samskiptamöguleika vegna ónógrar reynslu af tölvu- og upplýsingatækni.

Færð hafa verið rök fyrir því að tölvuvæðing leiði til aukinnar stéttskiptingar [3] og að aukin notkun tölva og tækni hafi yfirleitt haft neikvæð áhrif á líf kvenna t.d. með því að gera störf þeirra sífellt einhæfari og stýrðari [4].  Í því samhengi má nefna hvernig ný tækni hefur verið notuð í fiskvinnslu á Íslandi til að fylgjast nákvæmlega með vinnuframlagi kvenna og stýra vinnuhraða þeirra sem að mörgu leyti hefur leitt til þess að vinnuumhverfi þeirra hefur versnað auk þess að fækka atvinnutækifærum [5].  Atvinnuleysi hefur að undanförnu verið meira meðal kvenna en karla í landinu en stór ástæða fyrir því er eflaust að um þrefalt til fjórfalt hærra hlutfall kvenna á við karla hefur eingöngu lokið grunnmenntun (34% á móti 12% í aldurshópnum 30-39 ára; 41% á móti 11% í aldurshópnum 40-49 ára) [6].  Og ljóst er að lítil eða engin færni í notkun tölva og upplýsingatækni myndi skaða möguleika kvenna á landsbyggðinni enn meir en raunin er nú.

En hvernig er hægt að hanna námskeið um notkun tölva og upplýsingatækni sem tekur sérstaklega mið af þörfum og áhuga kvenna?  Miðað við ýmsar fyrri rannsóknir, sem ekki verða tíundaðar hér, og reynslu ætti meðal annars að:

1. Leggja áherslu á hagnýta notkun tækninnar í stað þess að kenna UM tölvur og tækni.
2. Miða námsefnið mjög við áhugamál kvenna/þátttakenda.
3. Tryggja að hver einstaklingur hafi aðgang að tölvu fyrir sig og fái beina reynslu í að nota hana.
4. Bjóða upp á félagsleg samskipti (beinan aðgang að vinum/öðrum konum) í staðnámi og á Neti.
5. Tryggja mikla aðstoð, sérstaklega í upphafi en þó þannig að hlutirnir séu ekki gerðir fyrir nemandann.
6. Hafa námskeið mjög skýrt og vel skipulagt.
7. Hafa námsefni og umhverfi aðlaðandi.
8. Undirbúningur  (s.s. slökun, þekking um þau stig í notkun tölva sem nemendur geta búist við að ganga í gegnum).

Eins og áður segir miðar þetta verkefni að því að hanna og prófa námskeið þar sem aðferðum, eins og taldar eru upp hér að ofan, verður beitt til að kenna konum að nýta sér tölvu- og upplýsingatækni.

Heimildir
1. Ríkisstjórn Íslands, Framtíðarsýn Ríkisstjórnar Íslands um
upplýsingasamfélagið. 1996, Reykjavík: Ríkisstjórn Íslands.
2. Gallup, Könnun á aðgengi og áhuga landsmanna á tölvum og Interneti, .1998: http://brunnur.stjr.is/interpro/for/for.nsf/pages/konnun-tolvur.
3. Yeaman, A.R.J., The mythical anxieties of computerization:  A Barthesian analysis of a technological myth, in Computers in education: social, political, and historical perspectives, R. Muffoletto and N. Nelson Knupfer, Editors. 1993, Hampton Press: Cresskill, NJ. p. 105-128.
4. Perry, R. and L. Greber, Women and computers:  An introduction. Signs, 1990. 16(1): p. 74-101.
5. Unnur Dís Skaptadóttir og Hildur Einarsdóttir, Veruleiki kvenna í Íslenskum sjávarþorpum:  Líf og störf kvenna í sjávarbyggðum. Í Morgunblaðinu. 1997.
6. Hagstofa Íslands, Konur og karlar 1997. 1997, Reykjavík: Hagstofa Íslands.

ã Solveig Jakobsdottir, 1998

This paper was written to prepare for a Leonardo application with the above name to create, implement and evaluate IT courses for female adult learners. The project was accepted and started in January 1999

The home and office of the 1990s has become a showplace for advances in computerized technology. Embedded computer chips are found in nearly every kitchen appliance, business machine, and entertainment device. Many children's toys are computerized. We bank through automated teller machines, buy gasoline by "paying at the pump" with electronic funds transfers, program the VCR with a string of numbers from a remote control device, communicate instantly via fax machines, and leave digitized voice mail messages for those we cannot reach directly. … Not everyone, however, rushes out to purchase or use the newest technological devices. (Rosen & Weil, 1995, p. 55)

Access to information technology and computers and skills in using such tools are becoming vital to be competent and technologically literate in today's workplace. To help increase the necessary access and skills among their nations and thereby promote economic growth, the European Commission (1996) has recently set forth an Action Plan "Learning in the Information Society." The plan is, among other things, intended to encourage the development of products that meet pedagogical needs both at national and local level and to train people and help them acquire necessary skills. One group of people that is especially in need of IT-related learning materials and aid are women who have not completed any education or training after compulsory education and live in rural areas. Our aim in this project is to enable such women to use computers as a tool for communication, education, and employment and at the same time to help rural development. To achieve those goals we will design, develop, and implement courses, tailored especially for the needs of women with little or no computer experience.

In this paper we will describe further our rationale for focusing on the above group, including how women's lives have often been negatively affected by the use of new technology and the evidence for the gender gap in computer and IT access and use. We will also discuss gender differences in reactions to computers and their use, and present design implications for our courses, based on those differences.

It has been argued that computerization is a vehicle for social stratification (Yeaman, 1993) and that to date computers and technology have predominantly affected women's lives negatively, forcing many women into low-paying, and increasingly automated and highly controlled jobs (Perry & Greber, 1990). As an example, in Icelandic fishing villages, women, who work in the fishing factories, are now being heavily monitored with the aid of technology and the pace of their work controlled (Skaptadóttir & Einarsdóttir, 1997). In addition work opportunites for women in Icelandic fishing villages have also become much fewer as a result of economical changes and increased reliance on technology in the fishing industry (Skaptadóttir & Einarsdóttir, ). And in general women across the country have been considerably harder hit by unemployment than have men (Hagstofa Íslands, 1997). A major reason appears to be that about triple the number of women than men (e.g. 34% vs. 12% in the age group 30-39) have only completed compulsory education (Hagstofa Íslands, ), a group which is much more affected by unemployment than people with more education.

Computer proficiency has joined mathematics as a limiting "filter" for people's educational and career choices (Campbell, 1992), and a computer-related gender gap can have very negative effects on girls' and women's education, occupations, and roles in society (Sanders & Stone, 1986). Gender differences favoring males regarding computers and their use have been a continuing concern among researchers and educators during the last decade. An extensive meta-analyses (Kay, 1992), of the numerous studies of gender differences in reactions to computers from pre-school to the college level, revealed striking differences regarding computer use. A large majority (78%) of the 32 studies of computer use reported that males used computers more than females did, whereas only about 12% reported the reverse, and there was also a considerable gender gap identified, in favor of men, in relation to computer-related attitudes and achievement. These results suggest that males and females do report different attitudes to computers, and they do experience computers differently.

In more recent years, studies have also shown large gender differences in Internet use among males and females, for example in Iceland. A survey (Sólveig Jakobsdóttir, Gyða Guðjónsdóttir, Jón Jónasson, & Jón Eyfjörð, 1997) among randomly chosen teachers and school administrators in the country showed that only 40% of the women claimed they had used e-mail personally, and 44% the WWW, whereas the respective percentages for men were 78% and 74%. In addition, only about 19% of the women claimed to be frequent Internet users (daily-weekly use) in contrast to about 40% of the men. Another study involving 354 randomly chosen 14 and 16 year old Icelandic students (Haraldsdóttir & Guðjónsdóttir, 1997) conducted early this year, showed that gender differences in Internet use are also found among teen-age students. A significantly higher percentage of the boys (68%) than girls (48%) claimed they had used the Internet. It appeared that there were gender differences, especially concerning the use of the WWW: 60% of the boys claimed using the WWW whereas only 33% of the girls did. In contrast, differences were less pronounced concerning on-line chat, e-mail; and on-line conferences. Another Icelandic survey (Gallup) indicating gender differences in Internet use, was conducted last November among 1200 people (age 16-75) (Ólafsson, 1998) and showed that men claimed to spend on average double the amount of time per week on the Internet than did women (6.8 hours vs. 3.2 hours). The same survey showed that people in rural areas and villages spent only about half the amount of time on the Internet than people in the capital area (or 5.8 hours vs. 3.3 hours). One conclusion from the survey was that the person least likely to be using the Internet and other information technology was an older woman with low wages, little education, and living in a rural area. It is interesting to note, however, that during the last five years many students (mainly women and many with only highschool diplomas), living in rural areas and villages in Iceland have completed a B.Ed., or M.Ed., degree, or teacher's license) with the aid of the Internet and on-line communication at the Icelandic College of Education. Many of these women considered the technology aspect of their studies (using computers and the Internet for communication and information access and solving technology-related problems) an important and empowering part of the curriculum (Jónasson, 1997). The same was true for a group of women completing a distance education program at a U.S. Midwestern women’s college who had overcome computer anxiety and cherished and used in their work the technology experience they had gained through the program (Jakobsdóttir, 1996b).

But how are courses best designed to help women to become confident computer users. There are several features that can be suggested based on previous research findings and experience. These include, e.g.:

  1. Emphasis on practical use and benefits of technology instead of a focus on the technology itself,
  2. Materials of interest to women.
  3. Lots of individual computer access and work and hands-on experience,
  4. Social elements/communication (access to friends/other women on- and off-line), some pair/group work,
  5. One-on-one help,
  6. High course structure,
  7. User-friendly environment/materials
  8. Various psychological preparations (e.g. relaxations techniques and knowledge of expected stages that technology users often go through – from novice to experienced and confident).

 

Several studies have shown gender differences in preferences for computers as toys versus tools, with males tending to regard computers as a toy to play games on or to play with but females regarding it more as a tool to accomplish specific things (Busch, 1995; Collis & Williams, 1987; Eccles, Wigfield, Harold, & Blumenfeld, 1993; Giacquinta, Bauer, & Levin, 1993; Jakobsdóttir, 1996a; Nolan, McKinnon, & Soler, 1992). Therefore, methods used to increase female interests for computers have included stressing their usefulness and making the benfits of their use clear (Sanders & Stone, 1986; Volman, 1995). One idea would also be to teach women to become computer/media lab assistants (on a voluntary basis) in the local schools and spark their interests in computer use through the(ir) children’s computer use.

Another related feature is to use/design learning materials catering to women’s interests and avoid giving a masculine image to the subject of computer literacy. There is a strong association of computers with men and masculine interests, e.g. through images in magazines, newspapers, computer graphics, and cover art.) (Brownell, 1993; Provenzo, 1991; Ware & Stuck, 1985), and therefore the association of computers to women and feminine interests needs to be strengthened. Two studies among children and adolescence showed that girls had much more interests than the boys in graphics including, e.g., female characters, peaceful, friendly scenes; and the girls appeared to have a high interest in color and detail (Jakobsdóttir, Krey, & Sales, 1994; Rogers, 1995). In contrast, the boys appeared to e.g. prefer elements of danger and suspense in their graphics, vehicles, and figure (male characters) in action. Similar differences may also be found among women and men. One researcher also emphasized including social aspects of computer use in courses designed to increase female interest in computers (Volman, 1995). However, one should avoid assuming that all women have stereotypically, feminine interests, and it may be important to find out interests of our future students before designing the course materials. Such a survey could help select WWW materials used in our courses. So far men have created the majority of web resources but women appear to be claiming more space for themselves than before as indicated by a growing number of websites such as FEMINA (at http://www.femina.com), Cybergrrl Web station (http://www.cybergrrl.com, and Geekgirl (http://www.geekgirl.com.au/).

Spender (1995) suggested that in addition to lack of other women on the net, and lack of materials of interest to women s barriers to women's online participation, economics (less money than men have to pay for access and equipment) played a considerable part. Therefore, it may be especially important to guarantee computer access for women. Also, because many women appear to lack assertiveness or will to compete for access, so when paired with a male or another more experienced/assertive female, they tend to sit back and let the other person do all the work/get all the experience (Jakobsdóttir, 1996a).

In spite of the above recommendation, women and girls have been found to enjoy social uses of computers, e.g. to have friends sit and work close by for mutual help and sharing accomplishments (Jakobsdóttir, 1996a). Also, the results reported above, regarding teenage Internet use, indicated perhaps that girls tended to have more interest in on-line communications than in using the web (Haraldsdóttir & Guðjónsdóttir, 1997). Extensive on-line communications have also been described as vital in several distance education courses (with the majority of students being female), with students engaging in a lot of on-line communication with peers and the teacher being more successful and less likely to drop out of the course (Jónasson, 1997). Pair and small group work can increase communication and give support but as described above, students should also have lots of individual access and work.

In addition to peer support, one-on-one help has been recommended to help people with computerphobia (Rosen, Sears, & Weil, 1993). However, teachers should be very careful not to take over students’ work but to act more like guides and give suggestions on how to proceed.

Yet another feature that may aid women to become more comfortable in technology-related courses concerns course structure. That is, female Internet-based distance education students have indicated a strong preference for courses that are well structured with a clear timeline for turning in assignments and divided into distinct units (Jakobsdóttir, 1996b; Jónasson, 1997).

Computer environment should also be as user-friendly as possible, and one concern comes up regarding courses for under-educated women in non-English speaking countries. Many of them do not know English very well, especially not the technical vocabulary associated with computers. Therefore, we will consider selecting computer types that provide an environment with text in the native language. In Iceland Macintosh computers do provide such environment but not PC’s (Windows).

Experts studying computerphobia have estimated that about 30-40% of the (U.S.) population to be severely affected by it and/or not wanting anything to do with technology (Weil & Rosen, July/August 1995). One successful programs, designed to reduce such negative feelings, is called the Computerphobia Reduction Program (Rosen et al., 1993). The volunteering participants in that program were college students of various ages (16-62) and ethnic groups but typical participants were women with lower-than-average computer knowledge, considerable computer anxiety, and low confidence in her ability to use computers. In addition, usually the women exhibited anxiety symptoms, including restlessness, wandering mind, sweaty palms, and high heart beat, that is were what the authors referred to as (overtly) anxious computerphobics. Among successful methods to treat such clients were systematic desensitation with relaxation techniques and thought-stopping/covert assertion but information/support was used for the people less affected (Rosen et al., 1993). The authors used scales and surveys to measure the participants thoughts and attitudes towards computers before and after the program (see examples of questions on the web (Rosen, August 30, 1997)).

We will consider including most or all of the above elements in the course design in our project, as well as other elements that may come up in further preparation. We hope to reach our goals with quality courses, designed especially for the needs of women that are in danger of becoming more marginalised than before as society is becoming increasingly reliant upon technology.

 

References

Brownell, Gregg. (1993). Macintosh clip art: Are females and minorities represented? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 116-122.

Busch, Tor. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.

Campbell, N. Jo. (1992). Enrollment in computer courses by college students: Computer proficiency, attitudes, and attributions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 61-74.

Collis, Betty A., & Williams, Richard L. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in adolescents' attitudes toward computers and selected school subjects. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 17-27.

Eccles, Jacquelynne, Wigfield, Allan, Harold, Rena D., & Blumenfeld, Phyllis. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.

European Commission. (1996). Learning in the information society: Action plan for a European education initiative (1996-98) (Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions XXII/285/96-EN).

Giacquinta, Joseph B., Bauer, Jo A., & Levin, Jane E. (1993). Beyond technology's promise : An examination of children's educational computing at home. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Hagstofa Íslands. (1997). Konur og karlar 1997. Reykjavík: Hagstofa Íslands.

Haraldsdóttir, Sólveig, & Guðjónsdóttir, Svava. (1997). Goðsögnin um þá hefð Íslendinga að gefa bækur í jólagjöf: Könnun á 14 og 16 ára unglingum. Unpublished B.A. ritgerð nr. 1175, Háskóli Íslands.

Jakobsdóttir, Solveig. (1996a). Elementary school computer culture: Gender and age differences in student reactions to computer use. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MnU-D 96-184. (UMI No. 9632384), University of Minnesota.

Jakobsdóttir, Sólveig. (1996b). Interviews with the first cohort of distance education students at a midwestern women's college. Unpublished Unpublished manuscript.

Jakobsdóttir, Sólveig, Krey, Cynthia L., & Sales, Gregory C. (1994). Computer graphics: Preferences by gender in grades 2, 4, and 6. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 91-100.

Jónasson, Jón. (1997). Evaluation of the distance education (B.Ed.) program at The Icelandic University College of Education. Unpublished Evaluation report/draft of M.Ed. thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

Kay, Robin H. (1992). An analysis of methods used to examine gender differences in computer-related behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 277-290.

Nolan, Patrick C. J., McKinnon, David H., & Soler, Janet. (1992). Computers in education: Achieving equitable access and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 299-314.

Ólafsson, Kristinn. (1998). Telephone conversation .

Perry, Ruth, & Greber, Lisa. (1990). Women and computers: An introduction. Signs, 16(1), 74-101.

Provenzo, Eugene F. (1991). Video kids. Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rogers, Patricia L. (1995). Girls like colors, boys like action? Imagery preferences and gender (Paper presented at the AECT conference, Anaheim CA ).

Rosen, Larry D. (August 30, 1997, ). Technophobia measurement instruments information.

Rosen, Larry D., Sears, Deborah C., & Weil, Michelle. (1993). Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 27-50.

Rosen, Larry D., & Weil, Michelle M. (1995). Adult and teenage use of consumer, business, and entertainment technology: Potholes on the information superhighway? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29(1), 55-84.

Sanders, Jo Shuchat, & Stone, Antonia. (1986). The neuter computer: Computers for girls and boys. New York: Neil-Schuman.

Skaptadóttir, Unnur Dís, & Einarsdóttir, Hildur. (1997, 10.8.). Veruleiki kvenna í Íslenskum sjávarþorpum: Líf og störf kvenna í sjávarbyggðum. [Interview with Unnur Dís Skaptadóttur on her research on the lives and work of women in Icelandic fishery villages]. Morgunblaðið.

Sólveig Jakobsdóttir, Gyða Guðjónsdóttir, Jón Jónasson, & Jón Eyfjörð. (1997, 23. ágúst 1997). Könnun og kynning Ísmennt, vor 97. Paper presented at the Þróun og nýbreytni í skólum: Málþing á vegum Rannsóknarstofnunar Kennaraháskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.

Spender, Dale. (1995). Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace. North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.

Volman, Monique. (1995). Gender-related effects of computer and information literacy education (pp. 1-13).

Ware, Mary C., & Stuck, Mary F. (1985). Sex-role messages vis-à-vis microcomputer use: A look at the pictures. Sex Roles, 13, 205-214.

Weil, Michelle M., & Rosen, Larry D. (July/August 1995). Byting back: Is tecnophobia keeping you off the Internet? (available on http://www.csudh.edu/psych/OTI.htm) : OnTheInternet Magazine - An International Publication of the Internet Society.

Yeaman, Andrew R. J. (1993). The mythical anxieties of computerization: A Barthesian analysis of a technological myth. In R. Muffoletto & N. Nelson Knupfer (Eds.), Computers in education: social, political, and historical perspectives (pp. 105-128). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Back